<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Movie Review &#8211; Gold Rush, The	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.fernbyfilms.com/2016/02/10/movie-review-gold-rush-the/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.fernbyfilms.com/2016/02/10/movie-review-gold-rush-the/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rodney		</title>
		<link>https://www.fernbyfilms.com/2016/02/10/movie-review-gold-rush-the/comment-page-1/#comment-383184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fernbyfilms.com/?p=40516#comment-383184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.fernbyfilms.com/2016/02/10/movie-review-gold-rush-the/comment-page-1/#comment-383176&quot;&gt;brikhaus&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ll be honest, it&#039;s taken me a while to get &#034;into&#034; doing a lot of Hollywood&#039;s early films, including silents and the Golden Age stuff, mainly because I felt inadequately knowledgeable about them and was gonna sound like a dimwit if I ever wrote about them. If you&#039;d asked me twenty years ago to watch a silent movie I&#039;d have laughed right in your face, but now I&#039;m more mature and open to their... history, so to speak, I&#039;m inclined to watch with an open mind on subject and quality. Not every silent movie I&#039;ve seen has been awesome (Hitchcock&#039;s early silent film output had about 1 great one to 3 or 4 shitty ones) but there are some diamonds there if you know where to look.  
 
I feel inadequate suggesting one to start with, mainly because I&#039;ve really only started my own journey with them myself, but one that absolutely surprised me with it&#039;s visual brilliance and stark visceral-ness was Hitchcock&#039;s &#034;The Lodger&#034;, which comes as close to replicating what I think a good Jack The Ripper movie might be like. That one legit surprised me with how good it was. If you watch it and can&#039;t find that entertaining, then just stick to more modern stuff because I don&#039;t think they get better than The Lodger. I have a review somewhere on the site you can check out, but it&#039;s worth a look for the beginner silent film watcher. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.fernbyfilms.com/2016/02/10/movie-review-gold-rush-the/comment-page-1/#comment-383176">brikhaus</a>.</p>
<p>I&#039;ll be honest, it&#039;s taken me a while to get &quot;into&quot; doing a lot of Hollywood&#039;s early films, including silents and the Golden Age stuff, mainly because I felt inadequately knowledgeable about them and was gonna sound like a dimwit if I ever wrote about them. If you&#039;d asked me twenty years ago to watch a silent movie I&#039;d have laughed right in your face, but now I&#039;m more mature and open to their&#8230; history, so to speak, I&#039;m inclined to watch with an open mind on subject and quality. Not every silent movie I&#039;ve seen has been awesome (Hitchcock&#039;s early silent film output had about 1 great one to 3 or 4 shitty ones) but there are some diamonds there if you know where to look.  </p>
<p>I feel inadequate suggesting one to start with, mainly because I&#039;ve really only started my own journey with them myself, but one that absolutely surprised me with it&#039;s visual brilliance and stark visceral-ness was Hitchcock&#039;s &quot;The Lodger&quot;, which comes as close to replicating what I think a good Jack The Ripper movie might be like. That one legit surprised me with how good it was. If you watch it and can&#039;t find that entertaining, then just stick to more modern stuff because I don&#039;t think they get better than The Lodger. I have a review somewhere on the site you can check out, but it&#039;s worth a look for the beginner silent film watcher. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: brikhaus		</title>
		<link>https://www.fernbyfilms.com/2016/02/10/movie-review-gold-rush-the/comment-page-1/#comment-383176</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brikhaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fernbyfilms.com/?p=40516#comment-383176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are so many legendary silent films I need to watch. I haven&#039;t seen any of them, mostly I&#039;m afraid that I&#039;ll be bored to tears and hate them. I don&#039;t want to ruin my film-watching cred. But I suppose I never had any to begin with. What do you think the best entry level silent film would be? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many legendary silent films I need to watch. I haven&#039;t seen any of them, mostly I&#039;m afraid that I&#039;ll be bored to tears and hate them. I don&#039;t want to ruin my film-watching cred. But I suppose I never had any to begin with. What do you think the best entry level silent film would be? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced (Page is feed) 

Served from: www.fernbyfilms.com @ 2026-06-01 02:07:58 by W3 Total Cache
-->